This twilight

This twilight is a pool

That I ease myself into

And the day, near completion

Is a comfortable memory

Filled with every moment

The sun could spin out

As hot and golden threads of flame

Woven into life together and alone

Now the moon rises to guide me quiet

Towards a silent, restful place

A place of pressed down grass and dreams

Beneath its healing gaze

Everything

My mind

It never stops

Just

Thought after thought after thought after thought

It’s like

If I were a shark

I’d never die

Because I just gotta keep going

How am I every gonna do anything

When I can’t stop trying to do everything

In 15 second increments?

And I would focus if I could

On one bright moment –

Just let it last

Like sanguine sleep after the longest day

The Present/Absent Kingdom of God: Schrodinger’s Kingdom

(I spoke at Altona United Church on May 15. This is the content)

PREFACE: Yesterday my wife and I visited the Red Dress Project on display in Morden to bear witness to the more than 4,000 Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in Canada. When we were done we walked safely and without fear back to our historic stone home and went about our lives.

According to Matthew 13:31-33 Jesus said – “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed that a person took and sowed in a field. It is the smallest of all the seeds, yet when full-grown it is the largest of plants. It becomes a large bush, and the ‘birds of the sky come and dwell in its branches.'” He spoke to them another parable. “The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a person took and mixed with three measures of wheat flour until the whole batch was leavened.”

We get the idea. Jesus was great with parables. A born teacher. The kingdom of heaven, or God, is small, nearly invisible, while at the same time acting to become a nurturing force that gives life and provides hope, nourishment and safe harbour. Simple analogies to describe that which people have arguably been trying to understand and define since we could understand and define things.

The kingdom of God…so many people spend their lives hoping for the kingdom of God to break forth, they look for signs and wonders; some get morbidly excited about wars and rumours of wars, pandemics and general global tragedy as they gleefully await escape from what they consider this prison of a planet – failing to recognize that we do not go to the kingdom of God – the kingdom of God comes to us and the kingdom of God is now…it is present…it is not coming, it has come.

How terribly, terribly disappointing. It’s like being a video gamer and told by a clever troll that the world’s greatest, most graphically astounding and realistic MMORPG simulation has been developed and when you ask to try it you are told – you’re in it right now – it’s called life.

Ugh. You roll your eyes with wild disappointment. Even though what you were told is true you don’t want life. You want to escape from it.

The idea that the kingdom of God is not yet here but is coming – this is a theology that results from a people being unable to explain how pain and suffering continue to exist despite being told that the kingdom of God has been established.

When we look around and we see what is happening in Yemen, in Ukraine, in Palestine, between Canada and First Nations, the struggles of the BIPOC and 2SLGBTQ+ communities; when we look to the past and are confronted with the holocaust or the Armenian genocide and more we can be excused for wondering “where in the world is the kingdom of God in all of this? Where in the world is God in all of this” and while we could be excused for such doubt the Kingdom of God is here nonetheless. It is this kind of struggle that drives people away from faith, not simply Christianity, but faith of all kinds. It was this kind of struggle that drove famous Canadian evangelist Charles Templeton, the founder of the first church I ever preached in, to atheism…and I have no doubt more will follow.

I entitled this – The Present Absent Kingdom of God and subtitled it Schrodinger’s Kingdom in an attempt at cleverness and as a nod to the renowned quantum physicist Erwin Schrodinger. Like a good teacher Schrodinger was trying to find a parable to communicate a very difficult concept in an easy to understand way. The concept was called quantum indeterminacy which states that an atom and sub-atomic particles can exist in two states at the same time until they are measured or observed (this is my over-simplification).

To do this he imagines a cat sealed lovingly into a box with a vial of poison that is set to break when a particular atom decays. But until the box is opened and the decay is measured the cat exists in two states – alive and dead. Not theoretically or philosophically – but actually in two states at the same time. It’s a very frustrating analogy that annoys many other physicists and it twists my brain every time I try to grasp it but it is apt when we think about the kingdom of God.

The kingdom of God is like this…alive and dead. Alive in promise, alive in word, dead until enacted. The message of the gospels is clear in this sense – the kingdom of God is not coming…the kingdom of God is here, inaugurated and demonstrated by Christ. This is why we end up with two very distinct kingdom theologies, or ways of understanding what the Bible says about these things. A social gospel theology that says the kingdom is here, now, let us enact it, and another that says, the kingdom is not here and we need to prepare and build our bomb shelters and hide out until it arrives. Like the idea of quantum indeterminacy it is annoying and confusing and much easier to avoid anything that is complex…but to do this does disservice to the truth.

A farmer in spring stands at the edge of their field after planting and sees the harvest they hope for. They look to the person next to them and say “this is a field of oat” and the person next to them says – “I see nothing.” Who is right? Is it a field of oat? Is it a field of mustard? Or is it nothing? In a very real sense this field exists because of the investment the farmer has made in terms of sweat equity and dollars. It has to exist, survival depends upon it…but it is fragile.

A baker sets aside dough and says to a customer – “here is bread and buns” and the customer says “it’s just a pile of dough.” Who is right? Are they both right?

One thing is sure – for the farmer and the baker – the certain hope they have requires action. The field requires sunlight, rain, pollination, fertilization etc. The dough requires a measure of heat. The kingdom of God is like this – it has existed, it exists, and it will exist but to be fully effective in this reality – it requires action, or we might also say, it needs to be acted upon otherwise it remains barren, lifeless and without hope, as if it did not exist at all. Useless in the lives of those who needed it, like yeast in the fridge instead of the dough or seed in the silo instead of planted in the field. Merely words and one cannot eat a word.

God is powerful as Word and nowhere is this better described then in the Gospel of John chapter 1, verse 1 where the author writes “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” We could stop here and feel something of awe at this description of that mystery which creates and moves all things but to do so would not be enough. God is powerful as that Word which speaks things into existence however God is most powerful as John continues to say, when that Word puts on flesh and tabernacles, that is to say dwells, among us; when that Word becomes action – this is God, the Kingdom of God, at its most powerful and effective.

A parent on road trip says to children fighting in the backseat – “If you don’t stop fighting I will…turn this car around.” Powerful words to an eight and nine-year-old on the way to Disneyworld but not as powerful as the action they threaten. This is what we call motivation. Perhaps you are from a bygone era where the words were “if you don’t stop crying I will…give you something to cry about.” The idea is the same. Words are powerful BECAUSE of the act they infer…alone they are empty.

I love you. I. LOVE. YOU.

No more powerful words exist in any language but the power of these words comes from the action they promise and commit to and not from the words themselves – love enacted in the life of the one loved. An embrace. An act of caring. Sacrifice. Love enacted. I love my wife and children even when they are not around. My love for them is real even when it is not being enacted because of the commitment and promise to enact it the word represents when I am with them. This is the kingdom of God – the Word love enfleshed and living intentionally in the world and the lives of the people around it.

When Adolph Hitler said “The holocaust is the solution to the Jews final question” these were powerful, horrible, evil words but not nearly so horrible or powerful as when they were enacted at the cost of more than six million Jews dead and with them all of their hope and all that they would ever be. To quote Clint Eastwood from the film Unforgiven – ““It’s a hell of a thing; killin’ a man. You take away everything he ever had and ever would have.”
Words are powerful. The words enacted, are more powerful.

Some words of bright promise are so powerful in the face of the dark, so overwhelming, that when they are not enacted, it is as if they never existed. The promise of the kingdom of God is like this. Perhaps the most promising and powerful set of words to be uttered and so painfully, obviously absent when not enacted.

We are the seeds to be sown, we are the yeast to be used. We enact the kingdom of God in the world and the lives of those around us. This is how the kingdom of God is present…and when we fail to act in love, forgiveness, grace, compassion, peace and understanding, this is how the kingdom of God is absent.

In his remarkable book Night, that tells of his experience as a Jew in Auschwitz, Elie Wiesel wrote “How was it possible that men, women, and children were being burned and that the world kept silent?”

Where was the kingdom of God? For Wiesel and others like him – it was absent. He wrote “It seemed as impossible to conceive of Auschwitz with God as to conceive of Auschwitz without God.” God was…but God was not. The kingdom of God was present, but it was not. Elie’s full Hebrew name is Eleazar which means in, ironically, “God has helped”. Eleazar who lost his father, mother and sister in Auschwitz.

The power of this kingdom that we and people everywhere wield is immense beyond measure. It is enough to move mountains literally. It was enough to stop the holocaust before it happened. But – it didn’t. Where was the kingdom of God for six million Jews? I would suggest to you that as present as it was in the lives of people everywhere it was also absent from those lives who needed it most. It was not present in any way that counts. It was present in the every single German SS officer in Auschwitz but it may as well have been seed stored up in silos and left to dry out or rot. It was meaningless and absent and the effects of its absence are far reaching in time and space.

The Italian writer of the book If this is a Man (which I recommend) and Jewish survivor of the holocaust Primo Levi committed suicide at the age of 67. In response his friend Elie Wiesel wrote “Primo Levi died at Auschwitz forty years later.” The consequences of the kingdom of God’s absence are far reaching in time and space.

When the kingdom of God is absent you have night. You have darkness, you have despair, and ultimately you have death.

Art Spiegelman, author of the astounding Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel Maus (M A U S) which chronicles his father and mother’s experience of the holocaust recalls his father Vladek’s words about Auschwitz – “But here God didn’t come. We were all on our own.” Spiegelman’s mother Anja committed suicide in 1968 at the age of 58.

The consequences of the kingdom of God’s absence are far reaching in time and space.

But thankfully – death is not the only word. The kingdom of God is present in each of us right now. You don’t have to end a holocaust to exercise it. Our collective work through our enacting the kingdom in the lives of others can do this, but as individuals our acts can be as small as a smile in the face of anger and pain sending a life in a better trajectory than before. It can be love in the face of hate. It can be a donation to a newly arrived Ukrainian or Palestinian refugee. It can be the raising of children in a house of compassion and tolerance. Each of these acts, like the proverbial butterfly that flaps its wings in Argentina and causes a tornado in Texas, has enormous potential to enact the kingdom of God and bring light to the seemingly ever present darkness that threatens to engulf us.

Remember the words of J.R.R. Tolkien (who had no small understanding of the kingdom of God) as presented in a dialogue between Frodo and Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Frodo who is bone weary of the dark times he lives in and the burden he carries to do something about it:

“I wish it need not have happened in my time,” said Frodo. “So do I,” said Gandalf, “and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”

As we prepare to go from this place may we consider what to do with the time we have been given and may the kingdom of God explode from us as a light that shines in a deep darkness through our words, through our actions large and small and through our lives as they intersect with others. Where we go we bring the kingdom of God and this is enormous privilege and an enormous responsibility. There is no question of where the Kingdom of God is when we act…there is no doubt of its absence when we do not act.

Remember the words of Elie Wiesel as we once again consider for instance the more than 4,000 MMIWG spoken of at the beginning in reference to all we know about our role in the kingdom of God – “Human suffering anywhere concerns men and women everywhere. ~ Amen.

Presentation to the Manitoba Legislature

Memory lane post – this is from the hansard to the Manitoba legislature back when I presented on the hope for a new provincial emblem represented by Bill 200 (which I am happy to report passed) to establish the Mosasaur Tylosaurus pembinensis as the official fossil emblem of the province of Manitoba.

Bill 200–The Coat of Arms, Emblems and the Manitoba Tartan Amendment Act

Mr. Chairperson: Now we would like to move to Bill 200 because of the out-of-town presenters, Peter Cantelon.

      Yes, Mr. Cantelon, do you have any written materials for presentation?

Mr. Peter Cantelon (Canadian Fossil Discovery Centre): Yes, I do.

Mr. Chairperson: Please distribute and go ahead with your presentation.

Mr. Cantelon: Thank you for the opportunity to speak in support of Bill 200. As the executive director of the Canadian Fossil Discovery Centre in Morden, Manitoba, this bill has a great deal of meaning to us and we believe a great deal of meaning and import to the province and to the nation as well. We are very happy to have seen it come forth.

      And as a representative of the Fossil Discovery Centre, I should point out to you in what you’re being–what you’re receiving is just some background information about the life that existed at one point in   Manitoba for a very, very, very long time, representing, I guess, some exceptionally distant previous residents, including the mosasaur that is being proposed in this bill to be a fossil emblem for the province.

      I don’t think I need to remind or educate anyone here on who Bruce is at the museum. Our premier exhibit at 43 feet long, the largest mosasaur on display anywhere in the world, which is a source of  pride for us, and also again a great source of educational content for the thousands upon thousands of students from the province and outside of the province, as well as from the United States, who come up to Manitoba for school tours and get an  opportunity to be introduced to something as fearsome and majestic.

      I would suggest that the timing of this bill is very incredible. Obviously, this bill has been in the works for quite a while now, but with the release of the recent Jurassic World and its reception globally suggests the interest in dinosaurs and their con­temporaries, mosasaurs, is staggering. And for those of you who aren’t aware–I’m sure many of you have already heard it–that film in its opening weekend grossed over half a billion dollars and–or more than the GDP of seven nations.

      There’s a high level of interest, whether a source of entertainment deserves that, the point is, there’s a great deal of opportunity to educate through the passage of this bill and the elevation of the mosasaur and prehistoric life, dinosaur and marine reptile life  in Manitoba, to elevate that and to make sure the   world understand that we are a world-class, world‑renowned location on a globe when it comes to the science and education that revolves around mosasaurs, et cetera.

      I would also just like to point out to you that by elevating the mosasaur to the status of an emblem of the province, you bring a greater level of educational opportunity, again, not only to students of the province, but, again, abroad, as well as the tourism benefit of doing that.

      Again, the timing is perfect, and timing in many instances is everything. And so I would encourage the committee to move forward with this bill. I think it can only benefit the province in all kinds of ways.

      I would suggest if you have the opportunity to consider it, that you would consider a minor revision that would see the mosasaur designated as the province’s official fossil emblem, as opposed to the province’s official marine reptile fossil emblem. It’s in keeping with the tradition of other provinces that have designated an emblem–rather than designating a very specific niche within the broader fossil environment–as well as other states and nations around the world. It’s a just a more–it flows better and it’s just more representative of what has been done.

Mr. Chairperson: Thank you Mr. Cantelon, for your presentation.

      Any questions from the members?

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Thank you for coming to present and for being involved in putting this forward. I’ve been to your museum many times and certainly enjoyed my visits and want to congratulate you on the work that you do.

Mr. Andrew Swan (Minto): Mr. Cantelon, I want to thank you on behalf of the government caucus for coming down and presenting tonight. Although I represent the west end of Winnipeg, I do have family in Morden, and my brother-in-law actually has served on the board of your centre. I want to thank you and your staff, and of course, your board members and all the volunteers for making the Canadian Fossil Discovery Centre a good but growing attraction here in Manitoba. And I think all  MLAs will do what we can to promote more Manitobans coming down and having a chance to visit Bruce and everything else that you have in your centre. So thank you.

Mr. Cameron Friesen (Morden-Winkler): Thank you, Mr. Cantelon, for coming this evening to committee and presenting to us. And I know you have been a tremendous promoter of the CFDC, as have your board members, and you’ve done a ton of work to shepherd this and other initiatives of the museum forward.

      And I appreciate you mentioning as well the fact that this is well timed to coincide exactly with the release of Jurassic World. As a matter of fact, I had a chance today to take a link and go to that website, and I saw there’s a whole page of that major motion picture that is dedicated to mosasaurs and telling all about the significance of these creatures and where they would have lived and when they would have lived and what their diet would have been and what they would have looked like. And I was really interested to see that the models there on that website are exactly like the models that I’m seeing rendered by the scientific community, especially with the recent addition of Suzy the mosasaur to join Bruce in the Mosasaur Hall in Morden.

* (18:50)

      I thank you for your–also for your comments this evening pertaining to a suggestion to tweak the bill itself. What I wanted to ask you about that–and I appreciate the comment to streamline the language to just fossil emblem and dropping off the marine reptile. What I wanted to ask you about that–and I appreciate the input–do you feel like that change would also have the wider support of the scientific community within Manitoba, or would some feel that we had perhaps left other possible specimens off the list for future consideration? Does that have the support of the community?

Mr. Cantelon: I believe it does. We were–we–a committee was commissioned by Minister Lemieux to look into this designation, and that committee was made up of representatives of the geological, paleontological and biological studies community throughout Manitoba. Various doctors in–leaders in their field and all of them recommended, at the end of the day, as a committee, that the mosasaur was the  best option in terms of representing Manitoba as   a fossil emblem. And so, with that in mind and   knowing that they each represented other components and other options that were considered, I think then that–and, in fact, I’ve spoken with the chair of that committee, and they support this as simply the fossil emblem.

Mr. Friesen: Just one question, Mr. Cantelon.

      As the CFDC, you’re coming off of so many successes in the–in recent history. Right now I’m thinking of the Guinness book recognizing Bruce as the largest specimen in the world. I think about some of the relationships that you have brokered with the University of Manitoba, with a memorandum of understanding. You recently, I think only just last week, you opened a new hall or a new theatre at the museum, and I’m sure there’s much more in store, because there always seems to be over there.

      What I wanted to ask you about was, with respect to this bill that would see the mosasaur established as a new emblem, what would that mean for the museum? You mentioned education and you mentioned tourism. What would it mean beyond the southern Manitoba region? What would it mean for the province in terms of identity and talking about our uniqueness?

Mr. Cantelon: I think it’s important to recognize that by doing this–designating a fossil emblem is something of national importance, and it would receive national and international recognition–there’s no doubt. I mean, we have seen international recognition at the CFDC for what I would consider smaller news. This is of critical importance, I think, both from an educational perspective. But, from a tourism perspective and profile perspective, it tells the world that Manitoba is one of the most significant places on the planet when it comes to fossils, and it brings the world in. It’s just something that’s at the top of the list in terms of interest right now and has always been interesting to people from a tourism perspective, which is paleontology and geology.

Mr. Chairperson: Thank you. Thank you very much.

      Now that concludes the list out-of-town presenters that I have before me.

The bill can be read here: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/bills/40-4/pdf/b200.pdf#:~:text=BILL%20200%20THE%20COAT%20OF%20ARMS%2C%20EMBLEMS%20AND,as%20Tylosauruspembinensis%20was%20discovered%20near%20Morden%20in%201974%3B?msclkid=6c9bb276d06311ec8039e1908b885d71

This is a test…

This is a test of the Emergency Podcast System. Season 0, episode 0 of my experiment in podcasting brought on by the gift of a new Yeti Blue Nano mic by my wife (who I hope will join me in this venture).

I’m too cheap to purchase an upgrade that would allow a more elegant RSS interface so just click the link –

https://player.rss.com/eba0/478481

shall we

shall we make sad choices for our friends and family
shall we make the choices too difficult for you and me
shall we call together the ones we missed and want to see
shall we break our peace and run to set those captives free

or

shall we sing in silence as the rotting dead pile up
shall we look away from the things we feel we cannot stop
shall we live in guilt and shame looking down instead of up
shall we close our mouths from singing cuz we could’nt drink from the cup

shall we sleep in darkness throughout each and every dismal day
shall we wear sackcloth and ash to match our soul’s fecund gray
shall we crawl upon our knees and make the decision to stay away
shall we live in this place of ours while others take the bill and pay

we shall we shall forever in disgrace we shall
we shall we shall forever in remorse we shall

or

shall we strive forever to be some kind of seed
shall we join our friends to fight and sing and stand and bleed

i don’t know what’s right to do
i don’t know which god to pray to
i just know i’m safe and fed
waiting here to bury the dead
i’m lost in crippling doubt that fills my crippling head
i’m drowning in my sea of peace while others give their lives to shed
i’m drowning in my sea of peace as others give their lives to shed…

identity

i am looking for an identity
a box of things just for me
a this and that for you to see
that i am different – uniquely

and so around the world i seek
into corners and crevices i peek
as a crow does, with my crow beak
proud of my singular. focused technique

and if perchance i take from you
a little something i did pursue
know that your gift – i will imbue
a purpose bright, a purpose true

i am me
and this identity
is new, not stolen from they or he or she
just borrowed and remade
that i might be measured, that i might be weighed
and found to be a gathered golem. a masquerade
in scrubbed lies, now truth arrayed