I was having a conversation with an exceptionally brilliant friend when my mind bent toward midrash, and mishnah – Hebrew words that represent a tradition Christianity would have done well to continue with. Midrash and mishnah are forms of collecting oral opinion, conversation and rulings of Jewish rabbis through history (this does not do the depth of the words justice but will have to suffice).
Collections of these things exist in the form of the Babylonian Talmud and others. The Babylonian Talmud is thought to contain the various midrash and mishnah from the Jewish period of Babylonian captivity.
While Christian scholars have certainly worked together throughout history and have come up with some great texts there is not the same sense of tense collaboration nor the same breadth of work available.
I would suggest the great creeds, catechisms and declarations of Christianity come out of a form of midrash/mishnah which should say something to us of the value of this form of exegetical work. Leaders in the community come together to pray and sweat over Biblical content for the sake of filling the gaps or better understanding the application in the many and myriad circumstances that arise and call for interpretation.
For several centuries our more common form of interpretation has been lecture. One person presenting a personal perspective wrapped in other personal perspectives derived from research and laid upon a biblical foundation (sometimes).
While this is not always a bad thing it lacks the communal aspect that is implied by midrash/mishnah. The idea of a group of individuals ruminating aloud over the same topic and presenting different perspectives within the same context is intellectually stimulating. It is compelling. The community has authority…history has shown this and communal exegesis can become a powerful form of authority when it comes to understanding scripture.
While there are wonderful collaborations within the academy of Christianity they are more often collections of individual opinions, formed in the rigorous (but dry) halls of theological study, divorced from the passionate context of immediate community which is rife with emotion, tears, laughter, anger, sadness etc.; rife with humanity that is.
This does happen. It actually happens all the time. At seminary we self-proclaimed kings and queens of theology would gather informally in the halls between classes and have at each other in just such fashion. But we never encoded our conversations; we never had an audience. I wish we had. We had these conversations at the intersection of passion – passion for scripture and passion for people and they were messy, beautiful trainwrecks of debate which we should have brought with us into the world and into the churches…but we did not. We left them behind in the halls of academia (often with our very passion) to become a thing of the past, a thing of memory.
I wonder what a Canadian Talmud would look like. I wonder what midrash and mishnah would look like in our context? What would it look like in your community? In your church?
Who could you gather regularly for the sake of hard-edged debate and wrestling over a topic or verse where the only rule is that we enter the ring in love and leave in the same condition? How cool would it be to record and transcribe these engagements for future reference?
It is when the word engages humanity within the context of messy community that powerful and real transformation can occur.
Often it is the bright and blinding light of another’s opinion (whether agreed to or not) that exposes new or refined truth for yourself. This is the idea of iron sharpening iron where there is bound to be sparks and possibly fire.
The possibilities of such a movement are powerful. One can even see broader possibilities that sound like the beginning of a joke: “a rabbi, a priest, an Imam and a pastor walk into a bar…”