Photonic Life

 
Music in my mind
spins a world a minute
whole lives lived
across seconds
 
beauty and pain
children like Athena
skull split spill forth
                    and land
ink on paper
photonic life scrawls
before my eyes
 
do you hear the same notes
are my children sweet sounding
or horrors to your ears?
 
no matter – just hear them
that’s all…

FILM WATCH: The Color of the Cross

 
This looks like it will be an interesting film. If anyone sees it before me let me know what you think. When I see it I will post a mini-review. You can visit the film’s website at – www.colorofthecross.com
 
———————
 

New film depicts Jesus Christ as a black man

Updated Wed. Oct. 25 2006 2:14 PM ET

Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — It’s a familiar image for millions of Christians: Jesus Christ, with a crown of thorns, hanging from the cross. What color is he? In a controversial new film opening Friday, he is black.

"Color of the Cross" tells a traditional story, focusing on the last 48 hours of his life as told in the Gospels. In this version, though, race contributes to his persecution.

It is the first representation in the history of American cinema of Jesus as a black man.

"It’s very important because (the film) is going to provide an image of Jesus for African-Americans that is no longer under the control of whites," says Stephenson Humphries-Brooks, an associate professor of religious studies at New York’s Hamilton College and author of "Cinematic Savior: Hollywood’s Making of the American Christ."

What Jesus looked like has long been debated by theologians around the world. Different cultures have imagined him in different ways, says Stephen Prothero, chairman of the religion department at Boston University. In Japan, Jesus looks Japanese. In Africa, he is black. But in America he is almost always white, like the fair-haired savior painted by Leonardo Da Vinci in "The Last Supper" in 1495.

While some black churches have images of a black Jesus behind the altar and others have claimed Christ was black, Prothero says "none of those arguments or images have filtered much into the mainstream."

Filmmaker Jean Claude LaMarre set out to change that with "Color of the Cross." LaMarre, who plays Jesus, wrote, directed and financed the film. It will open in 30 theaters in predominantly black neighborhoods.

"Black people in this country are the only race of people who worship a god outside their own image," says LaMarre, 38, adding that showing Christ as a black man is "the most poignant way to deal with the issue of race in this country because it goes to the heart of how we look at the world."

It also provides a positive image of blacks, something that’s been scant in the U.S., says the Rev. Cecil "Chip" Murray, longtime leader of L.A.’s First African Methodist Episcopal Church and a producer of the film.

"It could be revolutionary because, for four centuries in our nation, blacks have been at the lowest end of the stratum," he says. "I think it will traumatize the United States more than it will foreign nations who, to some extent, don’t have a centuries-old concept of equating black with negativity."

Humphries-Brooks agrees. Other countries are likely to view the film "in a more detached manner," he says, "because of the way (they) see our race-relations problem."

Why does race matter in the story of Christ?

"Jesus isn’t in the hands of historians," Prothero says. "What we have now is our own debate and, in that debate, race has to be a factor because race is a big predicament in American life."

Film is a powerful place to have the discussion, says Humphries-Brooks, who calls the medium "one of the last places that is quasi-public for the formation of values in America."

"Artistic and aesthetic views are as important in developing religious values as the words we speak. Everybody goes to the movies. Not everybody goes to the same church."

Filmmaker LaMarre thinks the film can only have a positive effect.

"The message is that colour, a coloured Jesus Christ, doesn’t matter," he says. "That’s why the movie is important. When you have one prevailing image out there, it suggests colour does matter."

What Am I Watching This Year (and why do you care)?

 
Ok I admit it…I watch TV. This year’s programs that I try to catch include:
 
– Doctor Who (great stories)
– Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip (fantastic writing)
– Smallville
– Heroes (so far…)
– House
– Battlestar Glactica
– The Daily Show
– How It’s Made
 
Cartoons
 
– Danny Phantom
– Spongebob Squarepants
– The Avatar
– Fairly Odd Parents
 
 

There once was a man from Nantucket…

 
I had a great conversation with J. the other day that got me thinking about structure, systems and rules of engagement in general. It seems to me that humans are not too keen on rules and structures. The odd thing about this observation is that it belies that myriad of differing and varyingly complex systems of rules and structures in places all over the world. Nevertheless I think that the only reason we put systems in place is out of a deep sense of self-preservation and a fear of chaos (both admirably legitimate concerns which I whole-heartedly share).
 
Still…despite this it seems our nature is to resist systems, to push the envelope of structures or to take the role of iconoclast and shatter them utterly. We tend toward the chaotic. The universe is moving toward entropy and we have a tendancy in this direction as well. I don’t say it is a good thing but an observation I have had.
 
In terms of society this manifests itself in anti-social behaviour, anti-establishment behaviour. Once again – I am not speaking of the right movement of people against systems and structures that perpetuate injustice rather I speak of the general desire to buck any system, just or unjust, because it limits a person in some way.
 
Cultural History moves in waves or cycles and there have been times of high adherance to structure (Victorian Age) and times of intense opposition to it (the Romantic era and the current post-modern).
 
Since culture is the inescapable water we swim in it should be no surprise that these movements impact pretty much every aspect of our existence – including (or especially) the church. In the church I see it manifested as a general desire to move a way from a rigid structure of systematic theology, rules, formats and formulas, styles of worship, prayer etc. To be sure God in His transcednance can not be systematized, boxed, packaged and programmed for our use. Of course over-structuring can also lead to legalism and this is NEVER a good thing.
 
In defense of the removal of structure it has been said that we do this in order to experience the free movement of the Spirit of God and we should be able to seek Him in the way we choose and that structural worship/rules inhibit this.
 
I think though that the deeper impetus of this anti-structuralism, anti-regulation is simply the aforementioned movement of people to chaos/entropy.
 
Look at it this way – as a poet I have latched on to a free-verse style in my writing. I find it liberating and brilliantly enabling in terms of giving me a voice to express my feelings. However – the poetry I admire most and consider the best are those poems that were written within a rigid set of rhyming/rhythmic structures and rules. In my opinion the greatest poem ever written is Edgar Allan Poe’s The Bells. To me the rhyme and metre of this poem is surpassed by nothing ever written. I believe that the beauty of this poem absolutely requires the rigid set of rhyme and rhythmic structures employed. As a free verse poem it would lose all power.
 
Some attempt to pay lip-service to structure in poetry by choosing the simplest of all poetic structures – the rhyming couplet. However the structure does not elicit much beauty from the poem or poet and is generally most suitable to a limerick like "there once was a man from Nantucket…" which we simply laugh at but are not moved or transformed by.
 
In terms of God and Christianity I suspect legalism is simply a Christian version of the limerick…it pays lip service to the value of structure and in the end is sadly laughable. The deeper beauty of Christianity comes at the cost of submitting to structure that is almost forced upon us. The underground church in China is growing at a passion and pace not seen since the days of the early church in no small part because of the repressive structures in place that constrain the church itself. The vine grows best when it is vigorously pruned and managed rather than left to grow uncontrollably and in chaos.
 
I suspect we will see beautiful things from the church in China and elsewhere where it is subjected to a certain rigidity. Afterall, the transcendant God who we worship as the most free of all chose to utterly constrain Himself into the rigid structure of human flesh with all the limitations that that entails when He came as Jesus Christ. Christ the immanence of God. Christ the most beautiful expression of God. But not without pain. Not without structure and limitation…

Spirit

 
There is a thread
woven through randomness
 
a breath-saved life
speaks against dark
wind borne hope-whispers
 
no weak voice
doomed to fall
but testimony
to the coming
hurricane
 

Hockey Boy!

Here is a pic of Matt playing hockey. Grades 5-9 in this league. He is enjoying the game a great deal which is pretty cool. Matt is in the red jersey at centre ice.

Astonishing.

 
How incredible is the universe God put us in? How overwhelming is the capacity of the minds He has given to us?
 
From CNN.com

LONDON, England (Reuters) — Beaming people in Star Trek fashion is still in the realms of science fiction but physicists in Denmark have teleported information from light to matter bringing quantum communication and computing closer to reality.

Until now scientists have teleported similar objects such as light or single atoms over short distances from one spot to another in a split second.

But Professor Eugene Polzik and his team at the Niels Bohr Institute at Copenhagen University in Denmark have made a breakthrough by using both light and matter.

"It is one step further because for the first time it involves teleportation between light and matter, two different objects. One is the carrier of information and the other one is the storage medium," Polzik explained in an interview on Wednesday.

The experiment involved for the first time a macroscopic atomic object containing thousands of billions of atoms. They also teleported the information a distance of half a meter but believe it can be extended further.

The Future is now a.k.a. red pill or blue?

 
The promise of the future gets in the way of the reality of today.
 
This sounds a little heretical given the emphasis in Christian circles on the imminent return of our Lord but I think it is true. We see the future as something yet to come and therefore it can become a little like a credit card with an unknown limit in our hands. We charge our sanctification to the future and put off the change and transformation of the Spirit to another time – yet to come. We are banking on having time tomorrow to get to what we know we need to do today in terms of love and the spiritual life.
 
To be sure our future is hopeful but it is as Paul says "a certain hope". A certain hope sounds like an oxymoron because certainty is rooted in the past and present whereas hope is rooted in the future. So what does Paul mean by this except that the future is already here. The Kingdom to come has already come and stands amongst us. While we sit immobilized in place wailing for the return of our Lord like the disciples in the upper room the coming Christ has come and is already here dispensing His Spirit and is watching to see what we do with Him. Has He found us faithful? The coming judgement has already occured because God is not bound by time. The idea then of a certain hope comes directly from the nature of God. Only God can provide a certain hope. The idea of the future as something other than a motivator to immediate action is not from God.
 
So shouldn’t this provide us with motivation to put our faith into action now? You would think so but the lure of the future is very strong. We do not see the future for what it is – the right-hand side of today – we see it as something completely different from the now and so we treat it differently. The devil would have us believe that because Christ and judgement is coming we have time. Time to get around to the timeless. But when God speaks to us of the promise of the future it is to galvanize our faith into action NOW. When God spoke to Abraham about the future it was to move him into action immediately. When Christ spoke of His glorious return it was not to ensure the disciples sat around in a brilliant haze dreaming of what would come but to passionately move them into the world at that moment – to take what would be and recognize that because it was God speaking they needed to treat the future as what WAS right then at that moment.
 
The enemy has taken the rallying cry of God’s future and turned it into a sinister lullaby and sings us into a dark sleep with it.  
"This is why it is said: ‘Wake up, sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.’ Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil." – Ephesians 5:14-16
Do we desire to live in the bleakness of black unconsciousness dreaming about the future or awaken ourselves to the light of Christ that moves us to see the future now?
 
For fans of The Matrix the question is this – which pill will you take: the red pill or the blue pill? The choice makes all the difference in (and to) the world.
 
 

Memories are Old Bones

 
Memories are old bones
stark and white
time-lost dinosaurs
not really there
just an empty void
shaped like what was
Pompei people fossilized
dusty in my mind
a chalk outline resemblance
of an old colourless past
feature and flesh filled in
                                 by what is
sepia tone static
 
inflexible,
              unchangeable,
                                   dangerously defining
 

Casey at the Bat

 

I don’t know why but it occured to me that I should post this old classic. Maybe there’s a message for someone out there in this. Enjoy!

Casey at the Bat

by Ernest L. Thayer

1888

The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the Mudville nine that day,
The score stood four to two, with but one inning more to play.
And then when Cooney died at first, and Barrows did the same,
A pall-like silence fell upon the patrons of the game.

A straggling few got up to go in deep despair.
The rest clung to that hope which springs eternal in the human breast.
They thought, "if only Casey could but get a whack at that.
We’d put up even money now, with Casey at the bat."

But Flynn preceded Casey, as did also Jimmy Blake;
and the former was a hoodoo, while the latter was a cake.
So upon that stricken multitude, grim melancholy sat;
for there seemed but little chance of Casey getting to the bat.

But Flynn let drive a single, to the wonderment of all.
And Blake, the much despised, tore the cover off the ball.
And when the dust had lifted, and men saw what had occurred,
there was Jimmy safe at second and Flynn a-hugging third.

Then from five thousand throats and more there rose a lusty yell;
it rumbled through the valley, it rattled in the dell;
it pounded through on the mountain and recoiled upon the flat;
for Casey, mighty Casey, was advancing to the bat.

There was ease in Casey’s manner as he stepped into his place,
there was pride in Casey’s bearing and a smile lit Casey’s face.
And when, responding to the cheers, he lightly doffed his hat,
no stranger in the crowd could doubt t’was Casey at the bat.

Ten thousand eyes were on him as he rubbed his hands with dirt.
Five thousand tongues applauded when he wiped them on his shirt.
Then, while the writhing pitcher ground the ball into his hip,
defiance flashed in Casey’s eye, a sneer curled Casey’s lip.

And now the leather-covered sphere came hurtling through the air,
and Casey stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there.
Close by the sturdy batsman the ball unheeded sped —
"That ain’t my style," said Casey. "Strike one!" the umpire said.

From the benches, black with people, there went up a muffled roar,
like the beating of the storm waves on a stern and distant shore.
"Kill him! Kill the umpire!" shouted someone on the stand,
and it’s likely they’d have killed him had not Casey raised his hand.

With a smile of Christian charity, great Casey’s visage shone,
he stilled the rising tumult, he bade the game go on.
He signaled to the pitcher, and once more the dun sphere flew,
but Casey still ignored it, and the umpire said, "Strike two!"

"Fraud!" cried the maddened thousands, and echo answered "Fraud!"
But one scornful look from Casey and the audience was awed.
They saw his face grow stern and cold, they saw his muscles strain,
and they knew that Casey wouldn’t let that ball go by again.

The sneer has fled from Casey’s lip, the teeth are clenched in hate.
He pounds, with cruel violence, his bat upon the plate.
And now the pitcher holds the ball, and now he lets it go,
and now the air is shattered by the force of Casey’s blow.

Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright.
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light.
And, somewhere men are laughing, and little children shout,
but there is no joy in Mudville –
mighty Casey has struck out.