This is one of those ridiculous personal observations based upon nothing except my own highly partial and arbitrary opinion.
Ever notice that there is a dichotomy of offence in the Christian world? Let us divide Christian North America into two realms for the sake of this discussion – the conservative and the liberal (I know the lines between the two are often blurred and both groups often don’t even know how to or care to define themselves…). The typical conservative tends to get fairly bent out of shape when it comes to sex and sexuality but usually doesn’t give violence much of a second thought. On the other hand the typical liberal Christian gets all twisted out of shape when it comes to violence but portrayals of sex and sexuality is usually passed over as relatively harmless (certainly in comparison to violence). What is the root of these differing perspectives?
In terms of scripture the Bible is certainly not anti-sex but definitely lays out the ground rules for it – there’s fornication (BAD) and then there’s sex within the bonds of marriage (GOOD). I would like to think that conservative’s primary issues with sex have to do with fornication but I suspect that the portrayal of sexuality within and outside of the bonds of marriage would garner a similar reaction.
Now the Bible has a great deal to say about violence (and certainly there is a great deal of violence in the Bible), and unlike sex it is difficult to find Biblical evidence that God has ordained a certain scenario within which violence can be celebrated and indulged in.
Now if we were to blend the two extremes into one perspective you would get one of three types of Christian:
1. A Christian who avoids both sex and violence in culture
2. A Christian who embraces both sex and violence
3. A Christian who knows God’s will in the extremes (pornography (BAD), snuff films (BAD) and seeks God’s will in the gray areas.
You guess which would be the most likely outcome…